which projects to add?

Agreed Maarten...over time new/missing info will be added to projects.

@Miek. I agree with you that it is nicer when someone adds a complete project description with images, companies, videos, news etc. But Urbika's setup is wiki-style (like wikipedia): a community where community members build upon each others content.

So I think it would be perfect teamwork when someone adds a new project and somebody else adds the companies and another person adds images and so on. Some members are good a finding new projects, other members are good at finding news and other members are excellent photographers... We should use each other strengths and what we enjoy to do...

Hallo Miek,

Dat hadden we volgens mij ook afgesproken, ja. Heel leuk dat zo veel projecten worden gepost, maar gewoon de info uit het SSC kopieren is niet genoeg, lijkt me, even de projectnaam intypen in Google doet wonderen!
Een beetje moeite om wat bedrijven of plaatjes te posten is volgens mij niet al te veel gevraagd.

MVG Mark

Just noticed that there are a lot of projects been added lately without any images, video or company info, even completed projects have just an overview page, correct me if i'm wrong but since we agreed here that its better to wait with adding planned/future projects untill there are renderings available i thought it would be best to add as much information as possible right away when you add a completed project since that must be allready available. What to do you think?

Miek37, i'll make some links inside the projects, first subproject:
http://www.urbika.com/projects/view/2050-stuttgart-21-pariser

Thanks!

Mark, i think its a good idea to post the subprojects as well because there is much variety of use, but its also interesting to know that they are all part of a larger plan so my suggestion is to make new projects pages for the subs and then link them to the Stuttgart 21 page where you can place links back to the different subpages.

I have found a few subprojects of the much larger project that i already posted with the name Stuttgart 21

http://www.urbika.com/projects/view/1063-stuttgart-21

Should i also post the subprojects of the much larger plan, is it wise to delete the much larger plan? What do others think?

^ I agree with the above.

@ maarten, Yoav. Yes, it's better to wait for a render! A model of the tower is good enough for me, extra renders can always be added! In order to avoid this problem, it's better to post first the projects which are currently under construction/completed, renders can be found more easily!

My opinion is: It's better to post a few projects with a lot of renders than many projects with no renders or few renders!

I think because Urbika is very visual it's better to wait for a render... But what do others / you think?

and what should i do if i know about a project/ tower, but i don't have any render?

all future and existing towers, significant architecture are very welcome!