What to add? (And what not?)

Urbika Help!

Jeroen Mul 2 years ago

What urban developments deserve to be added and which shouldn't be added? Are there any criteria?

New Comment

Comments

Miek37 2 yearss ago

Ok, it worked Maarten, thanks!

Maarten 2 yearss ago

^ just select the Architect when adding a project? (main architect)

user image

Miek37 2 yearss ago

Obviously but no.

Maarten 2 yearss ago

^ just select the Architect when adding a project?

Miek37 2 yearss ago

Ghehehe, i see it now, sorry! (grin) and thanks! ;-)

But now how to add a project of an architect who is allready in the "architect" list?

Chris Bakker 2 yearss ago

Go to the city you want to add a project, click on Add Project in the upper right corner. I think you can handle the rest yoruself :-)

Miek37 2 yearss ago

I'm missing the Unilever building in Rotterdam and i don't know how to start a projest (just added pics to existing ones) it sure has all the mentioned criteria.

Chris Bakker 2 yearss ago

^^
A new store in Hoofddorp.

I thought, let's add everything. It's a project summary right? So why not.

Maarten 2 yearss ago

Wurpel?

Jeroen Mul 2 yearss ago

In what aspect is 'Wurpel' special? ;-)

Chris Bakker 2 yearss ago

^^
I agree with that last thing. Just as there is going to be a new officepark in Hoofddorp. Not that special on first sight but interesting to know that it's going to be a full service cradle to cradle park wich is new for the Netherlands.

Maarten 2 yearss ago

That's an interesting question! I think we should answer "What are interesting projects to share?" As a start I think some of these aspects could be a criteria:
- it's interesting architecture
- new (sustainability) techniques are used
- famous architect
- impact on attractiveness city

Of course the "interesting" value is always relative to where it's build. The building above could be interesting in "Volendam" but is not interesting in a city like "New York". Other suggestions?